Simple Money Goal
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Top News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Top News
No Result
View All Result
Simple Money Goal
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

by
August 2, 2024
in Politics
0
Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has overturned a jury’s $4.7 billion verdict in the class-action lawsuit filed by “Sunday Ticket” subscribers against the NFL and has granted judgment to the NFL.

U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled Thursday that the testimony of two witnesses for the subscribers had flawed methodologies and should have been excluded.

“Without the testimonies of Dr. [Daniel] Rascher and Dr. [John] Zona, no reasonable jury could have found class-wide injury or damages,” Gutierrez wrote at the end of his 16-page ruling.

The jury on June 27 awarded $4.7 billion in damages to residential and commercial subscribers after it ruled the NFL violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses in the United States who paid for the package on DirecTV of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons.

The jury of five men and three women found the NFL liable for $4,610,331,671.74 in damages to the residential class (home subscribers) and $96,928,272.90 in damages to the commercial class (business subscribers).

Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could have been liable for $14,121,779,833.92.

It is not the first time the NFL has won a judgment as matter of law in this case, which has been going on since 2015.

In 2017, U.S. District Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell dismissed the lawsuit and ruled for the NFL because she said “Sunday Ticket” did not reduce output of NFL games and that even though DirecTV might have charged inflated prices, that did not “on its own, constitute harm to competition” because it had to negotiate with the NFL to carry the package.

Two years later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case.

It is likely the plaintiffs will again appeal to the 9th Circuit.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS
Previous Post

Harris narrows VP search to six finalists, plans to interview them this weekend

Next Post

Harris officially secures Democratic nomination for president

Next Post
Harris officially secures Democratic nomination for president

Harris officially secures Democratic nomination for president

Subscribe to Simplemoneygoal.com

    Airbus says most of its recalled 6,000 A320 jets are now modified
    Politics

    Airbus says most of its recalled 6,000 A320 jets are now modified

    December 2, 2025
    Campbell’s fires executive accused of racist remarks and labeling food for ‘poor people’
    Politics

    Campbell’s fires executive accused of racist remarks and labeling food for ‘poor people’

    November 28, 2025
    Bitcoin and other crypto assets sink in flight from risk
    Politics

    Bitcoin and other crypto assets sink in flight from risk

    November 24, 2025
    Stock market sinks as AI and interest rate worries grip investors
    Politics

    Stock market sinks as AI and interest rate worries grip investors

    November 24, 2025
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Copyright © 2023 Daily Trading Digest. All Rights Reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • Stock
    • Top News

    Copyright © 2023 Daily Trading Digest. All Rights Reserved.